<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: </title>
	<atom:link href="http://jasonfager.com/216-216/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jasonfager.com/216-216/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 01:38:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://jasonfager.com/216-216/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 05:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonfager.com/?p=216#comment-83</guid>
		<description>The constitution says that &quot;All bills for raising revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with amendments as on other Bills.&quot;  There isn&#039;t anything else about who has to draft or pass what first, but maybe there are other procedural rules in place?  That would be interesting to find out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The constitution says that &#8220;All bills for raising revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with amendments as on other Bills.&#8221;  There isn&#8217;t anything else about who has to draft or pass what first, but maybe there are other procedural rules in place?  That would be interesting to find out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles de Granville</title>
		<link>http://jasonfager.com/216-216/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles de Granville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 05:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonfager.com/?p=216#comment-82</guid>
		<description>No, no I don&#039;t. LOL. I made a pass, but couldn&#039;t find anything. I thought I saw it on the news this morning. But as a procedural matter, isn&#039;t the house required to pass the bill first if it were a new piece of legislation?

I do agree with your original point though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, no I don&#8217;t. LOL. I made a pass, but couldn&#8217;t find anything. I thought I saw it on the news this morning. But as a procedural matter, isn&#8217;t the house required to pass the bill first if it were a new piece of legislation?</p>
<p>I do agree with your original point though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://jasonfager.com/216-216/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 04:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonfager.com/?p=216#comment-81</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t read that anywhere, do you have a link?  Politico, the Sunlight Foundation, and other articles I&#039;ve gone through say that all these extra things are being tacked on to try to swing key votes in the House or to force particular delegations that already support the bailout to let through other legislation they oppose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t read that anywhere, do you have a link?  Politico, the Sunlight Foundation, and other articles I&#8217;ve gone through say that all these extra things are being tacked on to try to swing key votes in the House or to force particular delegations that already support the bailout to let through other legislation they oppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles de Granville</title>
		<link>http://jasonfager.com/216-216/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles de Granville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 04:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonfager.com/?p=216#comment-80</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not positive about this, but I believe this is a result of the measures that the senate had to take in order to vote on the bailout before the house. My understanding is that they had to basically append the bailout bill to another bill that the senate was going to pass, but hadn&#039;t yet. The idea was to get it passed in the senate first (where it was more likely to pass), which would then create momentum for it in the house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not positive about this, but I believe this is a result of the measures that the senate had to take in order to vote on the bailout before the house. My understanding is that they had to basically append the bailout bill to another bill that the senate was going to pass, but hadn&#8217;t yet. The idea was to get it passed in the senate first (where it was more likely to pass), which would then create momentum for it in the house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

